Digital transformation and change? It’s all about clarity, stability and company culture

Source: Data News (03/02/2017); Author: Els Bellens

Innovation and disruption have become fashionable words, but despite how often we use them, not all companies are ready to innovate. Far from it. We sat in on a lesson in Digital Leadership, a course at Vlerick Business School, where managers undergo a week-long immersion in digital transformation. An extremely important aspect of this is the approach to your company culture.

What is striking about the course is that hardly any of the participants are in IT. We find a grand total of one CIO in attendance, but the rest are marketing professionals, HR professionals and others. This hopefully makes it clear that digital transformation is no longer something that is left to the IT department to sort out. It is a sweeping change across the whole business. This means that the challenge lies in making the innovation comprehensible to the entire company.

Everything the way it used to be

Professor Peter De Prins explains that people have a natural aversion to change. If we are not given clear tasks, it is our initial reflex just to leave everything the way it used to be, he says: “People who don’t know where they are supposed to be going stay where they are.” To make change palatable, the main need is for clarity. “Create clarity,” says De Prins. And by that he does not just mean that you need to communicate more. “Communication is not the same as clarity.”

Incidentally, this aversion to change also has an adverse effect on organisations. “Many companies have been doing well for a long time. But then something changes: the housing market collapses, or maybe digitisation threatens profitability. And all of a sudden, businesses need to change their approach.” The problem, De Prins says, is that companies often fail to react appropriately to this changing world. “Doing new things is scary, because you don’t really know what you’re doing. People prefer being competent at something they have been doing for a long time to being incompetent at new things. Even if those new things might get the business back on track. That applies to both people and businesses,” De Prins explains. “They prefer just to wait and see.”

Managing stability

If the company does ultimately make the right decisions, things will go well again for a while. “That cycle used to last thirty to fifty years, from disruption to change to good times. Now disruptive technology appears on the scene every two to seven years,” De Prins claims. And that takes its toll. “A company is like a house. In the old days, you had time to repair all the cracks before the next storm. But that is no longer possible. And then the actual change is often not the problem. A much tougher challenge is that you cannot create enough stability to face the next change. This makes stability management more important than change management.”

How do you go about it, then? By getting the foundations right. “Change management is usually good at coming up with plans. Directors often have an overarching plan for several years, but people want to see results in the short term. This makes context important. The working environment, the processes that keep people working.”


So how do you make digital transformation palatable? Through clarity, stability and understanding the company culture. “Not understanding your company culture is one of the main reasons why change fails,” says De Prins. “Clear communication has little to do with giving new information. You need to understand what people have seen and heard, what they remember.” As a manager, you especially need to understand the context in which employees operate. “There are 101 ways of measuring corporate culture,” says De Prins. “And the results you obtain from measuring culture are worth their weight in gold.” For De Prins, the art of change management is also a question of being clear and stable. He lets us in on an important trick: “Change weighs much less heavily if people see all the things that have stayed the same. Because usually quite a lot of things do.”

Related news

  1. Soccer, M&A Prediction and Machine Learning

    Date: 05/01/2021
    Category: Opinions
    Currently, robotic process automation is often used in finance departments in order to redeem employees from dull chores. However, despite the booming field of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), financial applications of these techniques are quite scarce. By making a connection with a referee who needs to (dis)approve a goal, Lennert Van der Schraelen, Kristof Stouthuysen and Mathieu Luypaert try to establish useful applications concerning mergers and acquisitions (M&A).
  2. Are CFOs the Lucky Luke of decision-making?

    Date: 14/12/2020
    Category: Opinions
    Analysing data at a rapid pace in order to make decisive decisions based on the results delivered, is an issue that many companies and their decision-makers often struggle with in this digital world. Apart from the obvious technological aspect, you need an integrated view on data and decision-making and a data-driven company culture. The CFO can act as a major catalyst to help organisations transform towards a more agile and effective decision-making entity.
All articles